The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Sophia Zackrisson. Photo

Sophia Zackrisson

Research group manager, Principal investigator, Professor, MD

Portrait of Sophia Zackrisson. Photo

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of tumour and nodal stage in rectal cancer treated by primary surgery : a population-based study

Author

  • Cecilia Dahlbäck
  • Kevin Korsbakke
  • Thule Alshibiby Bergman
  • Jörgen Zaki
  • Sophia Zackrisson
  • Pamela Buchwald

Summary, in English

Aim: The preoperative stage of rectal cancer is an important prognostic factor affecting treatment recommendations. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for clinical staging to identify patients who should be recommended for neoadjuvant oncological treatment. The aim of this work was to investigate the accuracy of the preoperative T- and N-stage and also involvement of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) as determined by MRI in a Swedish national cohort. Method: Patients who had undergone resectional surgery for rectal cancer without neoadjuvant treatment in Sweden in the period 2013–2017 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (n = 2062). The T- and N-stage determined by preoperative MRI were compared with the histopathological results. The MRI-assessed MRF status was compared with the circumferential resection margin. Results: Sensitivity for differentiating T1-2 from T3-4 was 69% and specificity 77%. Sensitivity to detect N1-2 was 42% and specificity 81%. Sensitivity for MRF positivity was 50% and specificity 92%. Agreement analysed by weighted kappa analysis was 0.47 for T-stage [confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.51], 0.24 for N-stage (CI 0.19–0.24) and 0.20 for MRF status (CI 0.12–0.29). Conclusion: In this study, accuracy of the preoperative MRI was lower than expected for rectal cancers. Overstaging might lead to potentially harmful neoadjuvant treatment and understaging can lead to a higher risk of tumour recurrence. The results of this study show that efforts should be made to increase the accuracy of the preoperative evaluation in order to optimize treatment recommendations.

Department/s

  • Surgery
  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö
  • LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health

Publishing year

2022

Language

English

Pages

1047-1053

Publication/Series

Colorectal Disease

Volume

24

Issue

9

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Topic

  • Cancer and Oncology

Status

Published

Research group

  • Surgery
  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 1462-8910