The browser you are using is not supported by this website. All versions of Internet Explorer are no longer supported, either by us or Microsoft (read more here: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/windows/end-of-ie-support).

Please use a modern browser to fully experience our website, such as the newest versions of Edge, Chrome, Firefox or Safari etc.

Portrait of Sophia Zackrisson. Photo

Sophia Zackrisson

Research group manager, Principal investigator, Professor, MD

Portrait of Sophia Zackrisson. Photo

Deep learning performance on MRI prostate gland segmentation : evaluation of two commercially available algorithms compared with an expert radiologist

Author

  • Erik Thimansson
  • Erik Baubeta
  • Jonatan Engman
  • Anders Bjartell
  • Sophia Zackrisson

Summary, in English

PURPOSE: Accurate whole-gland prostate segmentation is crucial for successful ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy, focal cancer treatment, and radiation therapy techniques. Commercially available artificial intelligence (AI) models, using deep learning algorithms (DLAs) for prostate gland segmentation, are rapidly increasing in numbers. Typically, their performance in a true clinical context is scarcely examined or published. We used a heterogenous clinical MRI dataset in this study aiming to contribute to validation of AI-models.

APPROACH: We included 123 patients in this retrospective multicenter (7 hospitals), multiscanner (8 scanners, 2 vendors, 1.5T and 3T) study comparing prostate contour assessment by 2 commercially available Food and Drug Association (FDA)-cleared and CE-marked algorithms (DLA1 and DLA2) using an expert radiologist's manual contours as a reference standard (RSexp) in this clinical heterogeneous MRI dataset. No in-house training of the DLAs was performed before testing. Several methods for comparing segmentation overlap were used, the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) being the most important.

RESULTS: The DSC mean and standard deviation for DLA1 versus the radiologist reference standard (RSexp) was 0.90±0.05 and for DLA2 versus RSexp it was 0.89±0.04. A paired t-test to compare the DSC for DLA1 and DLA2 showed no statistically significant difference (p=0.8).

CONCLUSIONS: Two commercially available DL algorithms (FDA-cleared and CE-marked) can perform accurate whole-gland prostate segmentation on a par with expert radiologist manual planimetry on a real-world clinical dataset. Implementing AI models in the clinical routine may free up time that can be better invested in complex work tasks, adding more patient value.

Department/s

  • LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre
  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö
  • eSSENCE: The e-Science Collaboration
  • Urological cancer, Malmö
  • EpiHealth: Epidemiology for Health
  • LU Profile Area: Light and Materials
  • LTH Profile Area: Photon Science and Technology

Publishing year

2024

Language

English

Publication/Series

Journal of Medical Imaging

Volume

11

Issue

1

Document type

Journal article

Publisher

SPIE

Topic

  • Medical Image Processing
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Status

Published

Research group

  • Radiology Diagnostics, Malmö
  • Urological cancer, Malmö

ISBN/ISSN/Other

  • ISSN: 2329-4302